|
This
page was written in response to the many individuals
who have doubted Female Ejaculation and asked us
to, "Prove it!" Most of these doubters
that we have encountered appeared to be men. Why
is that? Do they feel threatened? Are they pessimistic
because of all the crap out there that passes for
porn these days? Are they just perpetual doubters?
Maybe all of the above.
Of women
who ejaculate, it appears to be unanimous that it is not urine.
Now that doesn't mean that there aren't some people out there
trying to pass urination off as female ejaculation. But our
topic here is whether it exists and not to separate the pretenders
from the real deal. As a man I can tell you that it is not the
same. I am also a fan of urine and have had the pleasure of
both FE and urine. Read my lips, THEY ARE NOT THE SAME! They
don't smell the same. They don't taste the same. They don't
look the same.
Many
people have passed off FE as a myth citing medical findings.
They say, "There isn't a gland large enough to carry that
much fluid." I have to ask "How would we know that?"
Not to my knowledge has there been surgery performed on a fully
aroused woman. (Not even Nazi Germany tried that one!) I don't
know of any corpses that were aroused during autopsy either.
(Someone correct me if I'm wrong about this.) So how would we
know?
People
have argued that there is no organ in a woman's body that could
possibly expand to that size. How can we determine that? I look
at a woman's body and I would conclude that there is no place
that a 13 pound baby could slide out. It just doesn't appear
possible! Especially considering the original size of the hole!
No way! I can't even get my whole fist in there! You're going
to tell me that a head the size of a cantaloupe is going to
come out that?!?
Yet
we know that women do give birth everyday. Millions of them
a year. So I guess that theory does not hold any weight. Sorry.....
I'm
sure there are still some doubters out there who want cold hard
scientific fact. Pickings are slim for such a thing. Not because
there is no supporting evidence but because there is just not
a whole lot of true scientific research on the topic. There
is a lot of controversy surrounding FE and not everyone wants
it solved. Many people argue that money should not be wasted
on this type of research. Ironically it appears to be the same
group of people that says it doesn't exist.
Below
are a few articles from websites that we have found that contain
some compelling information that FE does exist. Doubters please
pay special and careful attention to Dr. Beverly Whipple's findings.
That is Dr. as in Doctor Beverly Whipple. You wanted hard and
fast research? She IS hard and fast research. Her findings are
published in scientific journals. Here is the abstract from
one of her reports.
AU
Whipple-Beverly. Zaviacic-Milan.
TI Update on the female prostate and the phenomenon of female
ejaculation.
SO Journal-of-Sex-Research. May, 1993. v30(n2). p148(4).
AB A review of research concerning the female prostate, a specific
organ of the female urogenital system, is presented. This research
focuses on clinical interest, anatomical structure, and histochemistry
of the female prostate. Research concerning the phenomenon of
female ejaculation is reviewed in terms of findings relevant
to forensic medicine and sexuality. Further systematic research
is needed to determine if the female prostate, the Grafenberg
spot, and female ejaculation are functionally connected.
Here
is the list of articles. Not all of them are true scientific
research but they all hold compelling evidence:
Abstracts
from Journal of Sex Research
Dr.
Gary Schubach's "Female Ejaculation" Bibliography
Female
Ejaculation: What it is and how to do it.
Lovers'
Feedback Forum Female Ejaculation
I encourage
everyone to do research of their own. Look to your public library
(you will make that little old lady's day asking her about sex),
your local university or the Internet. We encourage everyone
to look for themselves and draw their own conclusions. And remember
to have fun!
Doc.........
|